Our attorneys have handled dozens of patent cases for plaintiffs and defendants across the United States. We have represented clients in the Central and Northern Districts of California; the Northern District of Illinois; Southern and Eastern Districts of New York; the District of Delaware; Eastern, Northern, and Western Districts of Texas; and the Court of Federal Claims.
The following is an exemplary list of our current and former clients, including the matters handled by our attorneys:
– Brightplus Ventures LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al., C.A. No. 2:22-cv-170 (E.D. Tex.)
– Brightplus Ventures LLC v. TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. et al., C.A. No. 2:22-cv-194 (E.D. Tex.)
– Hisense USA Corp. v. Brightplus Ventures LLC, C.A. No. 1:22-cv-2774 (N.D. Ga.)
– Mel NavIP LLC v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc., C.A. No. 2:22-cv-152 (E.D. Tex.)
– CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al. (E.D. Tex)
– CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al. (W.D. Tex)
– CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Cable One, Inc. (E.D.Tex)
– CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc., et al. (E.D.Tex)
– CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. Mediacom Communications Corporation (S.D.N.Y)
– CommWorks Solutions, LLC v. RCN Telecom Services, LLC (S.D.N.Y)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation (W.D. Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Google LLC (W.D. Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. and Dell Inc. (W.D. Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Apple Inc. (W.D. Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. ASUSTeK Computer Inc. (W.D. Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. HP Inc., (E.D. Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Dynabook, Inc. (E.D. Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Kyocera Corporation (E.D.Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Lightcomm Technology Co., Ltd. (E.D.Tex)
– KT Imaging USA, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation et al. (E.D.Tex)
– Google LLC v. Personalized Media Communications, LLC (USPTO PTAB) (IPR2020-00721)
– Google LLC v. Personalized Media Communications, LLC (USPTO PTAB) (IPR2020-00725)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. (E.D. Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Google LLC (E.D. Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Netflix, Inc. (E.D. Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Haier America Company, L.L.C. et al. (E.D.Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Hisense Co. Ltd. et al. (E.D.Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Tcl Corp. et al. (E.D.Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Tsinghua Tongfang Co., Ltd. et al. (E.D.Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al. (E.D.Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Vizio, Inc. et al. (E.D.Tex.)
– Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Funai Electric Co., Ltd et al. (E.D.Tex.)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. Texas Instruments Inc (W.D.Tex)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. NXP USA, Inc. et al (W.D.Tex)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. Synopsys, Inc. (W.D.Tex)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. Broadcom (W.D.Tex)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. Arastu Systems Pvt. Ltd. (N.D.Cal)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. Marvell International, Ltd. et al. (W.D.Tex)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. Socionext Inc. (W.D.Tex)
-Computer Circuit Operations, LLC v. Via Technologies, Inc. (W.D.Tex)
– Complex Memory LLC v. STMicroelectronics Inc. (N. D. Tex.)
– Complex Memory LLC V. Broadcom Corporation (N. D. Cal.)
– Complex Memory, LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC (N. D. Ill.)
– Complex Memory LLC v. Renesas Electronics Corporation et al (N. D. Cal.)
– Complex Memory, LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex.)
– Complex Memory, LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex.)
– FireNet Technologies, LLC v. Fortinet Inc. (N.D.Cal.)
– FireNet Technologies, LLC v. A10 Networks, Inc. (N.D.Cal.)
– FireNet Technologies, LLC v. Fujitsu Limited et al (E.D.Tex.)
– FireNet Technologies, LLC v. KEMP Technologies, Inc. (S.D.N.Y)
– Bicameral LLC v. NXP USA, Inc. et al (W.D.Tex.)
– USB Bridge Solutions, LLC v. Buffalo Inc., et al. (W. D. Tex.)
– USB Bridge Solutions, LLC v. Avant Technology, Inc. (W. D. Tex.)
– USB Bridge Solutions, LLC v. Shenzhen KingSpec Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., et al. (W. D. Tex.)
– Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC v. MapR Technologies, Inc. et al. (C.D. Cal./N.D. Cal.)
– Smart Authentication IP v. USAA (E.D.Tex.)
– Smart Authentication IP v. Evernote (E.D.Tex.)
– Smart Authentication IP v. LogMeIn (E.D.Tex.)
– Smart Authentication IP v. MongoDB (E.D.Tex.)
– LaserDynamics USA, LLC v. Arvato Systems North Americas, Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.)
– LaserDynamics USA, LLC v. Cinram Group, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.)
– LaserDynamics USA, LLC v. Advanced Duplication Services, LLC (S.D.N.Y.)
– Disk Authoring Technologies LLC v. Corel Corp. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Disk Authoring Technologies LLC v. Nero A.G. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. v. M&T Bank Corp. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. v. Santander Bank, N.A. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Proximity Monitoring Innovations LLC v. AssetWorks Inc. (D.Del.)
– Proximity Monitoring Innovations LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (D.Del.)
– Leighton Technologies LLC v. ASK, S.A. et al. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Leighton Technologies LLC v. GAO Group Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Leighton Technologies LLC v. On Track Innovations, Ltd. et al. (S.D.N.Y.)
– Disaster Warning Network, Inc. et al. v. United States of America (C.Cl.)
