Category

Patent Infringement
On behalf of client FireNet Technologies, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against Fortinet Inc.  The action involves U.S. Patent No. 6,317,837, entitled “Internal Network Node With Dedicated Firewall” and U.S. Patent No.’s 7,739,302, 8,306,994, and 8,892,600 each entitled “Network Attached Device With Dedicated Firewall Security.”
Continue Reading
On behalf of client Complex Memory, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against Broadcom Corporation relating to computer architecture and memory systems. The action involves U.S. Patent 5,890,195 entitled “DRAM With Integral SRAM Compromising A Plurality Of Sets Of Address Latches Each Associated With One Of A Plurality of SRAM”, U.S. Patent...
Continue Reading
On behalf of client Complex Memory, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against STMicroelectronics, Inc. relating to computer architecture and memory systems. The action involves U.S. Patent 5,890,195 entitled “DRAM With Integral SRAM Compromising A Plurality Of Sets Of Address Latches Each Associated With One Of A Plurality of SRAM”, U.S. Patent...
Continue Reading
On behalf of client FireNet Technologies, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against A10 Networks Inc.  The action involves U.S. Patent No. 6,317,837, entitled “Internal Network Node With Dedicated Firewall” and U.S. Patent No.’s 7,739,302, 8,306,994, and 8,892,600 each entitled “Network Attached Device With Dedicated Firewall Security.”
Continue Reading
On behalf of client Bicameral, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against U.S. and Dutch NXP entities.  The action involves U.S. Patent No’s. 6,008,727; 6,321,331; 6,639,538; 6,754,223; and RE42,092 electronic tags, debugger interfaces, monitoring systems, and networking equipment.  
Continue Reading
On behalf of client Complex Memory, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against Motorola Mobility LLC.  The action involves U.S. Patent No’s. 5,890,195; 5,963,481; 6,658,576; 6,968,469; and 7,730,330 relating to microprocessor and computer memory technology.
Continue Reading
On behalf of client Complex Memory, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against Renesas Electronics Corporation and Renesas Electronics America Inc. The action involves U.S. Patent No’s. 5,890,195; 5,896,550; 5,963,481; 6,393,590; 6,658,576; 6,968,469; and 7,730,330 relating to microprocessor and computer memory technology.
Continue Reading
On behalf of client FireNet Technologies, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against Fujitsu Ltd.  Fujitsu America, Inc.  The action involves U.S. Patent No. 6,317,837, entitled “Internal Network Node With Dedicated Firewall” and U.S. Patent No.’s 7,739,302, 8,306,994, and 8,892,600 each entitled “Network Attached Device With Dedicated Firewall Security.”
Continue Reading
On behalf of client FireNet Technologies, LLC, the firm has commenced a patent infringement action against KEMP Technologies Inc.  The action involves U.S. Patent No. 6,317,837, entitled “Internal Network Node With Dedicated Firewall” and U.S. Patent No.’s 7,739,302, 8,306,994, and 8,892,600 each entitled “Network Attached Device With Dedicated Firewall Security.”
Continue Reading
On behalf of client USB Bridge Solutions, LLC, the firm has commenced patent infringement actions against Buffalo Inc., Avant Technology, Inc. d/b/a EDGE Memory, and Shenzhen Kingspec Electronics Technology Co., Ltd.  The actions involve U.S. Patent No. 7,231,485 entitled “Universal Serial Bus (USB) Interface for Mass Storage Device.”
Continue Reading
1 2 3